If you’ve spent any amount of time lately listening to Democrats like ‘Little Dick’ Durbin, and the newly elected, and rather foul-mouthed, leader of the DNC, Tom Perez, you’re likely to have come away thinking that the Democrat Party must have an over-abundance of members, to the point where it can now afford to thin out some non-believers. Because it’s according to these two less than stellar imbeciles that the 28 percent of Democrats who oppose abortion now have no place in the Democrat Party. Now to be honest with you, I had no idea that anyone in the Democrat Party actually opposed abortion, so imagine my surprise when I heard that so many do.
Durbin echoed party chair Tom Perez Sunday in saying that there has become no room in the party for dissent when it comes to the abortion issue. It was during an appearance on the Communist News Network (CNN) that Durbin said, “I am committed to women’s rights under the law, reproductive rights certainly, and our party is [committed].” ‘Little Dick’ went on to say, “We’ve made that part of our platform and position for a long, long time. I know within the ranks of the Democratic Party there are those who see that differently on a personal basis, but when it comes to the policy position, I think we need to be clear and unequivocal.”
Apparently those who identify as Democrats and personally believe abortion is wrong can be allowed to remain in the party, but only on one condition, at least according to ‘Little Dick’. He said they can stay but only “as long as they are prepared to back the law, Roe versus Wade, prepared to back women’s rights as we’ve defined them under the law.” That is: all members of the Democrat Party are expected to publicly support abortion, regardless of what they may personally believe. Perez, who has struggled to unify the moderate and far-left wings of the Democrat Party, had also demanded conformity from party members on the subject of abortion.
Because what really got things started heading in this direction was in a statement released last Friday by Perez that said, “Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health.” And this statement went on to say, “That is not negotiable and should not change city by city or state by state.” Durbin and Perez’s disavowal of pro-life Democrats followed Bernie Sanders coming under fire for supporting a Democrat mayoral candidate in Nebraska who previously opposed abortion but later reversed his position after coming under some pretty significant pressure from liberal activists.
Despite Durbin and Perez’s rather ludicrous demands for ideological purity, a not-insignificant number of Democrats do seem to be pro-life. Pew Research Center found last year that 28 percent of Democrats say abortion should be illegal in most or all cases. Hispanic voters, a pretty reliable voting bloc for the Democrats, are deeply divided on the subject of abortion. Pew found that 49 percent of Hispanics say abortion should be illegal in most or all cases, while 48 percent say it should be legal in most or all cases. But I’m sure when it comes right down to it, those who are against abortion, I’m sure, could be financially enticed to change their mind.
And then, oddly enough, it was just this past Sunday, while on MSNBC, that House Minority Leader Nancy ‘Botox Eats Your Brain’ Pelosi appeared to contradict both Tommy ‘Garbage Mouth’ Perez and ‘Little Dick’ Durbin. She said, “Of course” Democrats can also be pro-life.” But it was after making the comment that Pelosi proceeded to quickly change the subject, and she did not address whether Democrats can support pro-life policies, in addition, to personally opposing abortion. So I’m curious, how does Ms. Pelosi really feel about this sort of dissent from within the Democrat ranks? Does she really disagree with Perez and Durbin, or not?
But look, isn’t this the sort of thing that drove, quite literally, millions of Democrats, and Democrat leaning independents, throughout the country to vote Republican this last election, especially in the formerly Democrat industrial heartland? Democrats have lost pretty much everything since 2010 mostly because of their rather narrow minded ideology that allows for zero dissent. Just look at a college campuses, also look at a map by voting districts, virtually everything that they managed to win was in a few large urban centers in a couple regions of the country. Democrats have now become a regional party with no appeal outside of specific liberal zones.
And I must admit that I get some level pleasure from watching the Democrats as they keep coming up with new and improved ways to expedite their own political demise. And you have got to love the Nazi-like, as much as I hate to use such an analogy, intolerance and demands for conformity. The Democrat Party now seems to be committed to a process that both encourages and endorses the ejecting of undesirables from their Party. Those being: Straight white males, those who are not for unfettered abortion, those who believe in God (but not Allah), the working class and rural America. Eventually they will eject all who identify as whites.
But why is it, do you suppose, that these supposed ‘leaders’ of the Democrat Party are so determined to bring about this rift within their own party? Are they so confident in their numbers that they are willing to lose the support of over a quarter of their voters because they refuse to support something that goes against their morals? What will be the result of these leaders telling people how to think and what to believe regarding their opinion on certain issues. Perhaps it will be that these voters who cannot side with the Republicans on so many issues, will turn to an independent candidate or simply sit on the sideline during the 2018 elections.
Now I realize that I am nowhere near a political strategist of any kind, but it would seem to me that the type of behavior we’re now seeing from the Democrat Party would seem to be more than a little foolish. President Trump won the election with such a close vote. And now it’s the my-way-or-the-highway crowd choosing to cast so many voters aside, risking the putting future elections even further into jeopardy. But I must say that my comfort in a shrinking Democrat Party is somewhat tempered by my concern that the Republicans only seem to have value when they are opposing the left, and most have no intention whatsoever of ever doing the right thing.
And the perfect example of such Republican hypocrisy is Obamacare. Because it was time after time that they pounded their collective chest as they put a repeal bill on Barry “Almighty's” desk. And now we find out the truth, that it was all merely for show. Because now that we have a president who would sign it, it’s now that all of a sudden their true intent, or lack thereof, becomes all the more obvious. So while I am glad for what we DON'T have, I have to wonder, and still have a great many reservations, about exactly what we DO have. The time has come for the Republicans to either shit or get off the pot because 2018 now hanging in the balance.
And as much as I hate to mention Hitler in reference to what’s going on here, because the comparison is overused, I do think he would be very proud of today's Democrat Party. He would see many similarities such as attempt at gun control, eugenics, violence to silence 'non believers', crony capitalism, police state tactics, informing on your neighbor, using 'immigrants' for jobs that 'Germans' won't do, and the censoring of, or banning outright, other points of view. And Democrats today can’t stand the Jews either. And it would seem that the more Islam takes over the Democrat Party, the more it will be aligned with the Nazis. But, we're seen as being the 'crazy' ones.