It would seem that Hitlery and the rest of her staff were in need of a safe space on Election Night. Or maybe, her aides were the ones who needed a safe space from her after she became aware that she was about to suffer the same outcome as did the 16 Republicans who had come before her. According to various reports, Hitlery was at some points inconsolably emotional, possibly even drunk, and physically threatening towards her top aides, as the reality that Donald Trump had handed her her ass began to sink in. She was described as “crying, inconsolably,” to the point where it was hard to understand what she was saying.
So the mystery of Hitlery going milk-carton missing on election night has now been solved. A Tuesday of cautious optimism for Donald Trump voters turned into an evening of rage for Hitlery. The Democrat presidential nominee, anticipating the postelection reaction of many of her supporters, culminating in what was to have been a spectacular fireworks display, began instead with the shouting of profanities, the banging of tables, and the turning of any object not nailed down into a missile. Such was the behavior from one whom so many had said possessed the right temperament for Commander-in-Chief.
That’s when, according to a radio host who spoke with a CNN reporter, things proceeded to get rather ugly. Multiple reports have surfaced that Hitlery and her team were so confident in their victory last week, that they started popping champagne corks before the votes had even begun to be counted. Perhaps the candidate herself also took part. A combination of a few drinks and an angry candidate may have led to Hitlery’s disappearance that night. Rather than make a concession speech, she refused to address her election night party and instead sent Podesta out to clean up the mess.
Anyway, it was reported that after the old girl came to the realization that there was simply no way she was gonna win this thing, and would fail yet again in her quest to become president, she went into a blind rage. It was someone familiar with the events that said, “she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage.” The appearance of campaign chairman John Podesta at Manhattan’s Javitz Center, and the dematerialization of his heretofore ubiquitous charge, perplexed in the first hours of Wednesday.
And it was Podesta that was tasked with telling those who had gathered to celebrate, that there would be no celebration. He said, “They’re still counting votes, and every vote should count.” And he went on to say, “Several states are too close to call, so we’re not going to have anything more to say tonight.” As Podesta recalcitrantly refused to recognize reality early Wednesday morning, Hitlery called Donald Trump to offer congratulations. The juxtaposition of the campaign chairman publicly vowing to fight around the time the candidate privately conceded the election left observers scratching their heads.
So obviously, if reports are anywhere near to being true, Hitlery’s mental state made it impossible for her to address her supporters on election night as is usually the custom. So, instead, Podesta gave a rah-rah speech on a boo-hoo night to cover for the absence of the first woman president, her fireworks, and her victory speech shout-outs to the mothers of the Black Lives Matter martyrs. Podesta said, “She is not done yet.” But most likely what she was not yet done with was her rather monumental, and very childish, temper tantrum. And this is the person we we’re told have the demeanor to be president?
So let’s face it, is it truly any wonder that so many of her devoted followers are now, and have been for over a week, emulating Hitlery’s rather juvenile behavior, going on full-fledged temper tantrums and riots, shedding massive amounts of tears just because the election didn’t go the way they wanted it to? They’re simply following the stellar example set by their fearless leader. Thank God for the rest of us, that she isn’t going to be the actual leader of our nation and with that the leader of the free world. This kind of behavior shows that Trump was most definitely the correct choice for President.
Yes folks, we dodged a rather sizable bullet here and in a very “bigly” way. Such pathetic behavior simply because she didn’t win makes the point very clearly that Hitlery simply is not fit to be president, and, thankfully, there were enough voters who came to agree with that sentiment. Hitlery had the audacity to air a TV commercial with the former commander of a nuclear missile silo. He sat there and talked about how Trump did not have the "temperament" to be president and possess the nuclear launch codes. Yet, here we had Hitlery throwing things and screaming like a spoiled brat simply because she lost!
But still there are those who say we're not out of the woods yet, that all George Soros has to do is to flip 39 delegates at about a million a pop and Hitlery can still become President on December 19th, not Trump. But I’m just not thinking that that’s likely to happen since you're talking about Certified Republican Electoral Representatives. Who, even though are not legally bound to vote for the party that chose them, it would be a move likely to put them under investigation, fine them or remove and replace them. Also some states allow the parties to require chosen Electors to vow to vote for the candidate they've been chosen to represent.
On that note, the Supreme Court has held that the Constitution does not require that Electors be completely free to act as they choose and therefore, political parties may extract pledges from electors to vote for the parties' nominees. Some state laws provide that so-called "faithless Electors" may be subject to fines or may be disqualified for casting an invalid vote and be replaced by a substitute elector. The Supreme Court has not specifically ruled on the question of whether pledges and penalties for failure to vote as pledged may be enforced under the Constitution. No Elector has ever been prosecuted for failing to vote as pledged."
Finally, here are but a few facts that you think would be sufficient to have those in charge of the Democrat Party pondering where it is that their party goes from here. It’s a rather obvious trend that Democrats, who are supposed to be so much smarter than the rest of us, should be able to pretty easily recognize. Because it was in 2010 that Democrats lost the House and some governorships. Then in 2014 they lost the Senate and picked up no governorships. And then this year, 2016, they ended up losing the White House as well as governorships. So, will they make changes or will it be full speed ahead moving even further to the left?